• 美國醫生稱肖是最偉大醫生之一 北美百名華人學者聯名倒方

    京港台時間︰2010/10/1  消息來源︰倍可親綜合新聞  網友評論 148 條
    保護視力!選擇讓您眼楮最舒適的背景色
    杏仁黃   秋葉褐  胭脂紅  芥末綠  天藍  雪青  灰  銀河白(默認色)

    美國醫生稱肖是最偉大醫生之一 北美百名華人學者聯名倒方

    相關新聞︰肖傳國案是方舟子的麥城?國際學術同仁公開信聲援肖傳國

    以下內容未經證實,可能存在“被簽名”情況,請讀者自辨真偽。倍可親刊登此文,僅為提供信息參考之用。

      肖傳國是“世界上最偉大的醫生之一”,“他不僅屬于中國,也屬于全世界”

      ——美國科學家高度評價肖傳國和“肖氏反射弧”,強烈質疑所謂肖氏襲方說

      Evan Kass MD

      Chief of Pediatric Urology

      Beaumont Children's Hospital

      I have known Dr Xiao for years and in my opinion, he is a good man, a caring physician, gifted surgeon, and an honest investigator. The scientific basis for his surgical procedure was initially developed in the animal laboratory and the results published in peer reviewed journals. Only after years of research was it applied to humans. We have been involved in a prospective study to evaluate this procedure and have constructed a valid research protocol for this project. Dr Xiao, has been involved with the deveopment of the research protocol and has cooperated fully with us and understands that the results of this study will be published. He has not tried to hide any of his research results or any other information. He is considered by the physicians and scientists in the United States as a respected colleague. Mr Fang, on the other hand, is an individual who is reported to have published research that was not his, and was reportedly called on it by Dr Xiao.

      He has conducted himself as a man seeking revenge at all costs and has tried to discredit Dr Xiao at every turn. One has to wonder if these claims of assault are real or imaginary. It makes no sense for a man of Dr Xiao's stature to hire some fools to punch Mr Fang and then return to China sometime later to be arrested. If he had hired someone for this task, wouldn't he have known that they were arrested prior to his return to China from Argentina and avoided arrest?? Dr Xiao is a brilliant man, and this reported assault attempt seems to be the work of a fool, not Dr Xiao.

      Evan Kass,醫學博士

      博蒙特兒童醫院泌尿外科主任

      我認識肖醫生很多年了,在我看來,他是一個好人,一個充滿愛心的醫生,天才的外科專家,誠實的研究者。他的外科手術(反射弧手術)的科學基理首先是通過動物實驗研究得來的,其成果發表在專業學術期刊上。經過多年的研究,這個成果才被用于人類。我們參與了一項前瞻性研究來評價這個手術,而且已經為這項研究建立了一套切實可行的操作規則。肖醫生從一開始就參與了這項操作規則的建立,與我們進行了充分合作,並清楚該研究結果將被公布。他沒有試圖掩蓋他的任何研究結果或者任何相關信息。他被美國的醫生和科學家們認作是一個值得尊敬的同事。另一方面,方先生(方舟子)是一個曾經被揭發剽竊他人成果的人,而肖醫生就是那個揭發者。方先生因此不顧一切地尋求報復,利用各種機會試圖詆毀肖醫生。這種攻擊是令人難以想象和置信的。說肖醫生這樣的人會去雇佣幾個傻瓜去打方先生、不久回國去讓人逮捕,這樣的事是沒有道理的。如果他真的雇人做這種事,難道他不會知道這些人在他自阿根廷回國前就會被逮捕,而避免回國嗎?肖醫生是個聰明的人,而制造這個襲擊企圖的人是某個傻瓜,不會是肖醫生。【張清翻譯】

      Gary

      Over the past few days, I have only slept three hours each day and have read a lot online about Dr. Xiao and Mr. Fang. I feel that it is my obligation to let the world know what kind of person Dr. Xiao is.I frankly tell everyone that I make friends only with those who are unselfish and care about others. Even though we are friends from the

      same school or same class if I find him selfish, then we are not friends anymore. I have known Dr. Xiao for thirty years since 1980. Dr. Xiao is my friend because he meets my standards for being a friend. Dr. Xiao is a decent unselfish and upright fellow, who works very hard for his patients and for the health of all mankind.

      In 1986 we lived in the same building and same floor, with our doors facing each other, separated by the hallway. Later on he went to England, and I came to the United States. We met again in Washington DC in 1988. In January 1995 my brother came to the US for Graduate Studies and he was supposed to arrive at 6:30pm. Unfortunately my car completely broke down on that day at 3pm. It takes two hours from Philadelphia to JFK airport. I was nervous and sweating. I called my friends in NY; there was no one available to help. When I called Dr. Xiao, he agreed to help without any hesitation. I couldn’t imagine how my brother would feel if no one showed up to pick him up at the airport. I went to Xiao’s home at 9pm to collect my brother. My brother always appreciated Dr. Xiao’s kind help for his first arrival in the United States. Xiao said it is too trivial to mention it, and that you would do the same if you were me. When we had moved from University of Pennsylvania to New York in 1995, we contacted each other more often.In the new year of 1997 my wife and I invited Dr. Xiao to a restaurant; we tried to persuade him to stay in the US to pursue Surgical Urology.

      He said he is going to have a big grant from NIH for another five years. He would continue to do research here. In the meantime he would also return to china, because there were many paralyzed patients in China from coal mine collapses needed him. He could have had a US citizenship very easily, however he didn’t want it. He stated after he finished this five year grant, he would return to china permanently.

       Gradually he spent more and more time in China than here at NYU until finally he symbolically traveled to NYU twice a year. He was invited to give lectures all over the world to tell urologists and neurosurgeons about this procedure he invented; so that they may help more people worldwide. Unlike Fang’s claim that Dr. Xiao’s procedure had a 73% failure rate, Dr. Xiao’s revolutionary surgical procedure can be successfully reproduced all over the world, from United States to Chile and Argentina.

      However Mr. Fang started to claim that Dr. Xiao was a full time professor at NYU, therefore not qualified to apply for member/fellow of Chinese Medical Academy. Besides that he claimed that Dr. Xiao’s procedure was not medically sound. Mr. Fang also tried to undermine Dr. Xiao’s professional and academic contributions.Dr. Xiao sued Fang in Wuhan, China for Libel/slander and won that case. Mr. Fang claimed that Xiao had won the case because that it was Xiao’s home City. Dr. Xiao then sued Fang in his home city which was Beijing.

      But Fang claimed and the Beijing Court agreed that he is a permanent resident of the US, and that Chinese law did not apply to him, although he lived in Beijing all year round. Dr. Xiao then sued Mr. Fang in the United States. But when the summons was delivered to Fang’s Address in California, there was no such person living there at all. Because Dr. Xiao exhausted all the legal ways that he may counter Mr. Fang with no success. Mr. Fang attacked Dr. Xiao even more aggressively in any opportunity he had without any fear of reprimand.Please note it is illegal, immoral, and unethical for someone with bad faith to instigate patients or make fake stories to sue Dr. Xiao.

      However, no matter how aggressive and dirty Mr. Fang treated Dr. Xiao, Dr. Xiao should tolerate and tolerate again. We condemn all kinds of violence no matter who did it. Our world is not perfect. We have people with personal interest, who intentionally attack Dr. Xiao with bad faith.

      Now Mr. Fang has won, and Dr. Xiao is in police custody. It is a tragedy for Dr. Xiao and a tragedy for the world. The world will lose one of the greatest doctors. Do you think Mr. Fang bad faith slander and Beijing Courts unjust are responsible for this?

      Dr. Xiao is a great doctor, who not only belongs to China, but also to the whole world. He travels around the world to teach other urologists and neurosurgeons the method he invented to help paralyzed patients gain control over their lives. Doctors all over the world will respect, salute, and sympathize with Dr. Xiao.

      來源︰[news.sciencemag.org]




      我們是一群生活,學習和工作在海外的華人。時值中秋和國慶佳節,在思念故鄉親人的同時,我們十分關注肖傳國教授涉嫌雇人報復方舟子先生一案(以下簡稱肖方案)。方舟子和肖傳國都曾經和我們一樣在海外生活學習和工作過,但他們先後回到了祖國。前者從事科普寫作和打假活動;後者繼續從事他的專業泌尿神經外科的教學,科研和實踐,成為一位知名的教授和醫學科學家。通過網絡,我們中的大多數或多或少知道方舟子和肖傳國各自的經歷以及在過去十年中他們之間的爭論和恩怨, 但我們萬萬沒有料到事情會發展到一方涉嫌雇人報復另一方的地步。毋庸置疑,雇人行凶是犯法行為,罪犯理應受到社會的譴責和法律的懲罰。肖方案一經媒體報道,輿論導向和公眾反應自然是一邊倒的.方舟子是打假英雄和受害者,而肖傳國則是昔日的騙子今日的罪犯。但是對許多象我們這樣了解他們兩人和他們之間恩怨的人來說,肖方案並非那麼簡單那麼單純;對我們來說,也許用離奇兩字來形容此案更為恰當。在回顧了肖方兩人爭執的歷史,特別是方舟子對肖傳國的打假歷史,和研讀有關肖方案的媒體報道之後,我們感到有必要向審理此案的機構和關注此案的公眾講一講我們的想法,疑惑,和建議。我們不僅希望肖方案能得到公正透明的審理,也希望所有人都能從此案學到些什麼,更希望這樣的悲劇不再發生。首先,我們真誠的希望警方能提供和公開詳實確鑿客觀的證據,證明肖傳國有計劃有步驟的買凶報復,而不是他一時的沖動。我們也真誠的希望法院在審理肖方案過程中,允許足夠的透明度,允許主流媒體列席,允許肖傳國的親朋好友旁听。我們祝願肖傳國能找到最能代表他利益的辯護律師。

      其次,我們由衷的希望法院在審理肖方案的過程中,充分考慮方舟子和肖傳國在過去約十年的爭執史,特別是在過去約六年內方舟子策動和主導的對肖傳國全面,包括全球中文網和國內其他各種媒體,的打假運動,充分考慮這一運動對肖傳國心理和身理造成的陰影和傷害。和我們中許多從事科學研究和科技開發的經歷一樣,肖傳國的泌尿神經外科特別是肖氏弧的研究是從零開始一步一個腳印經過多年努力逐漸發展起來,其中有成功也有失敗;這是科技發展的普遍規律。肖傳國多年的科研歷程是有記錄可查的,比如他獲得的美國國家健康所的科研基金和在國際頂級泌尿科雜志上發表的論文,所以把肖傳國批判成一個徹頭徹尾的騙子,不是意氣用事就是別有用心。根據我們的了解,方舟子主導的對肖傳國的多年全方位的打假運動已經遠遠超過了學術爭論的範疇。我們深深懷疑這種打假是否可以被認為是一種通過網絡對肖傳國的長期騷擾甚至迫害。時至今日,方舟子在其新語絲網頁上仍展示著他收集(包括自己撰寫)的近660多篇自2005來對肖傳國及其科研的批判文章,其中不包括在新語絲論壇對肖傳國及其家人親屬的侮辱和謾罵。這些文章在全球中文網絡和其他媒體影響很廣;我們中多數人讀過其中很多文章。我們認為,如此數量龐大的針對一個人大批判,是讓人驚心動魄的,匪夷所思的,罕見的,也許在文革的浩劫中也是不多見的;這種大批判對被批判者肖傳國造成的生理和心理的創傷想必是巨大的,對他的工作和生活造成的困擾也是令人無法想象的。三者,我們進一步希望法院在審理此案的過程中充分考慮肖傳國自2005年以來一直在尋求使用正當的法律程序來討還公道,保護自己,撇清方舟子對自己科研的誣蔑。他曾在武漢北京美國等地多次狀告方舟子誹謗。我們非常好奇,如果肖傳國真的象方舟子所批判宣傳的那樣是一個徹頭徹尾的大騙子,那他怎麼敢到中美各地的法院和方舟子對簿公堂?這樣的“大騙子”實在聞所未聞。由于方舟子對肖傳國的批判總是以學術打假為名由,法院傾向于把方舟子對肖傳國的攻擊看作學術爭論,其結果是肖傳國狀告方舟子效果甚微。即使肖傳國在武漢勝訴,當地法院對方舟子的判決無關痛癢,更何況在北京肖傳國居然敗訴。在上文中,我們提到我們懷疑方舟子對肖傳國的批判超越了學術爭論範圍,幾近網絡迫害,可惜網絡迫害罪還有被正式立法,肖傳國無法以網絡迫害罪起訴方舟子。方舟子對肖傳國的攻擊並沒有因為肖傳國告狀而停止,事實上不但沒有停止,反而變本加厲。如果肖傳國雇人報復方舟子證據確鑿,那麼我們認為,對通過用法律程序來維護自己清白的絕望,可能是導致肖傳國想到采用別的途徑來尋求公道的一個重要原因。

      最後,我們想就肖方案談談方舟子打假特別是其學術打假的正當性問題。2006年,120位中美華人學者聯名發表公開信倡導學術機構建立完善自我監督機構,並且置疑非學術人員主導學術打假行為的正當性。肖方案的發生不得不再一次讓我們思考這種一人登高急呼群情響應打之(即涉嫌造假者)的所謂方舟子式打假特別是學術打假方式的合理合法性。我們認為作為社會一員,在發現或懷疑涉嫌造假的人和事後,每個人有向官方媒體,單位,政府,和其他機構舉報或揭發的權利,但是個人似乎不應該擁有直接打擊涉嫌造假的人和事的權利。如果個人可以自己或伙同他人對涉嫌造假者實行打擊,這很容易發展為私設公堂動用私刑。這顯然不符合文明社會的基本法則,其弊端也是顯而易見的。方舟子曾在媒體采訪中表示,可惜自己打假只有揭發權,沒有懲罰權,並抱怨社會對造假者懲處不嚴。我們認為,這是方舟子有意無意的低估了自己打假的能量和實際後果,為自己推卸責任。將涉嫌造假的人在全世界中文網上游街示眾大肆批斗以至于再揭其隱私辱其親友師長,長年累月,比如方舟子對肖傳國的打假,早已超過了僅僅揭發的範圍,事實上這比許多普通的懲罰措施要嚴厲的多的多。西方許多國家如美國已經意識到網絡跟蹤騷擾暴力等行為的危害,並開始逐步制定相關法律予以制裁。我們希望中國立法機構能盡快考慮制定有關網絡暴力的法律,使得受害者有法可依,違法者受到應有的懲罰。在非學術領域,我們呼吁國家應該盡快建立完善各種對涉嫌造假的人事的舉報機制,逐漸取消方舟子式打假;在學術領域,我們強烈呼吁國家盡快取締方舟子式打假行為。科學研究無疑需要接受社會的監督,但由于科學研究的特點和規律,我們認為非專業人員和社會大眾對科研工作者個人及其研究工作的直接干涉是完全不正當的。

      在美國,我們中一些學者所從事的科研會涉及一些並不為全社會成員接受的課題,比如非常有爭議性的人體胚胎細胞的研究。反對人體胚胎細胞的研究的民眾,並不會直接針對我們這些個體研究人員進行干擾和抗議,因為如果有人膽敢這麼做,很可能會被以恐嚇罪以至于從事社會恐怖活動罪被控告。他們能做的是通過種種方式向政府和科研機構申訴或抗議,以期影響國家和科研機構的政策修訂及實施,最後才會影響到每個從事科研的個體人員。所以,社會民眾如果對某些科研項目及科研人員有異議,正常的做法是向國家相關單位或相關學術機構提出交涉甚至抗議,以期這些單位或機構對個別科研人員和及其所從事的課題進行查辦,而絕對不應該私自打擊這些個別科研人員和無端攻擊他們的科研結果。

      科學研究中的是與非真與假成與敗的判決遠比其他領域的要來得困難,這不是普通民眾能簡單判斷的。在科學發展歷史上,很多突破性的成就,一開始甚至被很多所謂的專家們認定是假的錯誤的,未受過專業訓練的普通民眾更無從判斷。懂得科技發展史和有過真正科研經歷的人都知道,科技的發展是在失敗和成功的交替中進行的,往往失敗多于成功。中國成語有失敗是成功之母之說,英語成語也有失敗是通向成功的階梯之謂;在科技發展中,正是如此。愛迪生從想到用碳做燈芯到真正實現這個想法,據說經歷了成千上萬個方案的失敗,但由于他的堅持不懈,最後還是取得成功。試想,如果在一千個失敗的方案後,愛迪生自動放棄或由于被人打假而放棄,那麼這一發明創造就會腹死胎中,實用電燈的發明會被推後。在醫藥領域,藥物或其他治療方法效果的建立需要依靠嚴格控制的科學實驗和數據分析,並不能有一些病人自我的感受好的壞來簡單決定,用幾個特例更不能說明問題。這也遠遠超出了普通民眾或非專業人員的感性認知和判斷的範疇。科學研究的這些特點進一步說明在科學研究領域,個人帶領大眾進行學術或科技打假的荒謬性和不現實性。我們認為離奇的肖方案正是方舟子式學術打假所造成的一個悲劇。取締方舟子式學術打假方式就是為了避免這類悲劇再次重演。方舟子式學術打假必將嚴重影響和干擾中國科研人員的正常科研活動,從而阻礙中國科技的發展。我們再次申明,我們呼吁取締方舟子式學術打假,並非呼吁取消學術打假,而是希望用社會監督專家評議機構主導這種更健康更符合科學研究內在規律的方式取而代之。謝謝您的閱讀和關注;如果您同意我們的想法和觀點,歡迎加入我們的行列。
     

    肖傳國案是方舟子的麥城?國際學術同仁公開信聲援肖傳國

     
    以下內容未經證實,可能存在“被簽名”情況,請讀者自辨真偽。倍可親刊登此文,僅為提供信息參考之用。



      國際學術同仁聲援肖傳國醫生的公開信

      2010年9月29日

      致所有人︰

      我們都有幸認識肖傳國大夫多年。他是一位受國際學術界尊敬的外科醫生和科學家,在恢復(脊椎損傷病人的)排尿和排便功能的神經再生研究中,他取得了重大進展。肖傳國醫生在美國完成了開創性的動物實驗研究,闡明支配大腿的運動神經可以用來繞接支配膀胱和排便。這個繞接可以形成一個反射作用(反射弧)來啟動來膀胱功能。他研究的成果已經多次發表在同行評議的國際科學期刊上。其他的科學家也已經重復並證實了肖醫生的這些研究結果。

      肖醫生最終鼓起勇氣將動物實驗研究的成果轉化到臨床試驗上,在中國的脊柱損傷和脊柱裂病人身上開展神經繞接(神經通路重建,即反射弧)手術。在中國,由于缺乏抗痙攣藥物antimuscarinics和間歇性導尿術(自插導尿管),神經性膀胱功能障礙成為一種威脅生命的疾病。能緩解神經性膀胱功能障礙的並發癥的療法,就是一種能夠拯救生命的成功。神經性膀胱和排大便功能障礙患者的病情是很痛苦的,包括遭受尿瀦留、尿失禁、反復感染、腎功能不全、大便失禁、便秘等,生活質量極差。神經通路重建手術是一個非常復雜的手術,需要神經的再生。不應當把手術的成功定義為完全恢復排便排尿功能。這項手術的重點在于收益超過風險。

      肖醫生的臨床研究成果發表在多種學術刊物上,並兩次獲得Jack Lapides佳作獎,這是獎勵在神經泌尿科學界作出重要貢獻的科學家的最崇高的國際性大獎之一。2008年,因為他的科學成就,肖醫生還獲得了國際兒童排尿節制學會頒發的Kelm Hjalmas演講者(受邀做大會主題發言)榮譽。我們當中的許多人都曾經到中國去檢視肖醫生治療過的患者的情況,觀摩或者學習他發明的神經通路重建手術。肖醫生是一位非常有經驗的外科醫生,他對患者熱情照顧,不知疲倦地培訓來自世界各地的醫生們,來推廣他的神經通路重建手術。 在美國,已經開展過一項獨立而且嚴格的先期試驗來檢驗這項手術的安全性和效益。術後一年的治療結果最近發表在《泌尿科學雜志》( Journal of Urology)上。在12個月的隨訪期間,在9位脊髓裂患者中,有7位患者,觀察到皮下至膀胱的神經反射弧的構建成立,證明神經通路重建手術的確起了作用。這個成績是了不起的,肖醫生應該得到嘉獎。並且,一部分患者已經展現出大小便排便功能的改善,並將隨時間推移而變得更好。術後36個月的成果正在分析中,不久就會發表。該先期試驗的數據是支持“肖氏手術”的,現在受NIH(美國國立衛生研究院)資助的臨床試驗正在開展,以進一步在脊髓裂患者中研究腰椎至 神經通路重建。還有,在肖醫生的幫助和指導下,類似的臨床試驗也在世界範圍內開展。

      中國人民和政府應該為肖醫生對病人所作出的貢獻、對他的科學成就,和他在世界上培訓醫生以推廣這項手術的誠意而自豪。國際科學界對肖醫生被拘捕的消息感到震驚。我們這些了解肖醫生的人,都對他涉入此案感到難以置信。肖醫生是一個極富同情心的紳士,他的誠實和對本學科作出的開創性的科學成就廣受世界同行的尊敬。我們懇請中國政府和有關權威機構公正對待肖大夫,並在案情調查期間保障他的基本人權。在此事件中,請重視肖大夫對世界所作出的科學和人道主義事業的貢獻。

      謹致

      Kenneth M. Peters, MD

      Professor and Chairman of Urology

      Beaumont Hospital

      Royal Oak, Michigan

      (美國Beaumont醫院泌尿科主任)

      Jack S. Elder, M.D.

      Chief of Urology, Henry Ford Health System

      Associate Director, Vattikuti Urology Institute

      Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Michigan

      Clinical Professor of Urology, Case School of Medicine

      (美國密西根兒童醫院泌尿科主任)

      Edwin A. Smith M.D.

      Assistant Clinical Professor of Urology

      Emory University School of Medicine

      Atlanta, Georgia

      (美國艾默里大學醫學院臨床助理教授)

      Kevin M. Feber, MD, FAAP

      Board Certified in Pediatric Urology

      Comprehensive Urology

      William Beaumont Children's Hospital

      (美國William Beaumont兒童醫院醫生)

      Ananias C. Diokno, M.D., F.A.C.S.Executive Vice President & CMOBeaumont

      HospitalRoyal Oak, Michigan 48073 USA

      (美國Beaumont醫院執行副總裁)

      Juan Jos  de Benito

      Urologist

      Hospital Nacional de Cl nicas

      C rdoba, Argentina.

      (阿根廷國立醫院)

      William E. Nantau B.Sc., CNIMClinical ManagerClinical Neurophysiology

      DepartmentBeaumont Hospital Royal Oak

      (美國Beaumont醫院臨床神經生理科臨床主管)

      Evan J Kass MD,FACS,FAAPChief, Division of Pediatric UrologyBeaumont

      Childrens HospitalProfessor of Urology, Oakland University-William Beaumont

      School of Medicine

      (美國Beaumont兒童醫院泌尿科主任,奧克蘭大學醫學院教授)

      Jacques Corcos MD.Professor of Urology, McGill UniversityGeneral Secretary

      of the International Continence SocietyJewish General hospital3755 Cote Ste-

      CatherineMontreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1E2

      (加拿大麥基爾大學泌尿學教授,國際兒童排尿節制學會秘書長)

      Jose Gonzalez, M.D.

      Department of Urology

      Beaumont Hospital

      Royal Oak, Michigan

      (美國Beaumont醫院泌尿科醫生)

      Christopher Payne, MD

      Associate Professor of Urology

      Stanford University Medical School

      Stanford, CA 94305-5118

      (美國斯坦福大學醫學院泌尿學副教授)

      Kenneth I. Glassberg, MD

      Director, Division of Pediatric Urology

      Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-Presbyterian

      Professor of Urology, Columbia University

      College of Physicians and Surgeons

      3959 Broadway, CHN 1118

      (美國哥倫比亞大學醫學院泌尿學教授,兒童泌尿學分科主任)

      Earl Y. Cheng, MD

      Associate Professor of Urology

      Children’s Memorial Hospital

      Chicago, Illinois

      (美國芝加哥兒童醫院泌尿學副教授)

      Darius J. Bagli, MDCM

      Professor of Surgery

      Senior Associate Scientist

      Director of Urology Research

      Divisions of Urology and

      Developmental & Stem Cell Biology

      The Hospital For Sick Children

      Institute of Medical Science

      University of Toronto

      (加拿大多倫多大學外科學教授,泌尿學研究主任)

      Henri B. LOTTMANN, MD, FEBU, FEBPS, FRCS(england) FEBPU

      Paediatric urology unit

      Hopital Necker-Enfants-Malades

      149, rue de S vres

      75015 Paris

      France

      (法國Necker-Enfants-Malades醫院兒童泌尿科醫生)

      Dr. Amrish Vaidya MS. MCh.Consultant Paediatric Surgeon,Kokilaben Dhirubhai

      Ambani Hospital,4 Bungalows, Andheri W, Mumbai, India

      (印度Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani醫院醫生)

      Marc Cendron, MD

      Associate Professor in Urology

      Harvard Medical School

      Children’s Hospital Boston

      Boston, MA

      (美國哈佛大學醫學院泌尿學副教授)

      Stuart B. Bauer, MD

      Associate Director, Neurourology

      Professor of Urology

      Harvard Medical School

      Children’s Hospital Boston

      Boston, MA

      (美國哈佛大學醫學院泌尿學教授,波士頓兒童醫院神經泌尿科副主任)

      Edmond T. Gonzales, Jr., MD

      Professor of Urology

      Baylor College of Medicine

      (美國貝勒醫學院泌尿學教授)

      Richard Macchia, MD FACS

      SUNY Distinguished Teaching Professor

      Cleveland Clinic, Florida

      (美國Cleveland臨床中心教授)

      Benjamin Girdler, MD

      Urology Center of the Rockies

      Fort Collins, Colorado

      (美國科羅拉多洛基泌尿中心醫生)

      William C. de Groat, Ph.D.

      Professor of Pharmacology

      University of Pittsburgh

      (美國匹茲堡大學藥理學教授)

      Michael R. Ruggieri, Sr., Ph.D.

      Director of Urologic Research

      Temple University School of Medicine

      (美國坦普大學醫學院泌尿學研究主任)

      Stanley J Kogan MDChief, Pediatric UrologyChildren's Hospital at

      MontefioreBronx NY USA

      (美國Montefiore兒童醫院兒童泌尿科主任)

      Anthony Caldamone, MD

      University Urologic Associates, Inc.2 Dudley St Ste 185Providence, RI 02905

      (美國布朗大學泌尿學中心醫生)

      Yves Homsy MD, FRCSC, FAAP Clinical Professor of Urological Surgery and

      Pediatrics University of South Florida Children's Urology Group 5507 E.

      Longboat Blvd Tampa FL 33615

      (美國南弗羅里達大學臨床泌尿學教授)

      Dr. Enrique Turina

      Professor of urology of the National University of Buenos Aires

      Chief of section Urology of Instituto de Rehabilitaci n

      Government of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

      (阿根廷國立Buenos Aires大學泌尿學教授)

      Dr. Angel Oz n

      Urologist of the Instituto de Rehabilitaci n of Buenos Aires

      (阿根廷國立Buenos Aires大學泌尿學醫生)

      Dr. Daniel Ekizian

      Urologist of Instituto de Rehabilitaci n.

      (阿根廷國立Buenos Aires大學泌尿學醫生)

      Professor Dr. med. Karl-Dietrich Sievert

      Vice Chair Prof. of Urology, Director - Uro-oncology, Neurourology,

      Incontinence, & Reconstructive Urology Department of Urology University of

      Tuebingen D72076 Tuebingen, Germany

      (德國Tuebingen大學泌尿學教授、主任)

      Holly Gilmer, MD

      Chief of Pediatric Neurosurgery

      Beaumont Hospital

      Royal Oak, Michigan

      (美國Beaumont醫院兒童神經外科主任)

      Yegappan Lakshmanan, MD

      Chief, Pediatric Urology

      Children’s Hospital of Michigan

      (美國密西根兒童醫院兒童泌尿科主任)
  • 责任编辑:sn
  • 相关文章
  • 发表评论
  • 评分: 1 2 3 4 5

        
  • ·请遵守中华人民共和国其他各项有关法律法规。
  • ·用户需对自己在使用本站服务过程中的行为承担法律责任(直接或间接导致的)。
  • ·本站管理员有权保留或删除评论内容。